May 26th, 2008, 01:51:49
|
#1
|
|
One Who Has Ideas
|
Proc Descriptions
Please add to LE Proc Descriptions what they do.
Simple. Do it!
More detail? Not that it's needed detail but, seems only apt as I'm asking for more detail.
Currently procs show, when shift+click or just by mousing over if you have tooltips enabled:
Code:
Affiliated Renewal
Description:
In combat you will occasionally heal your team, including yourself. This is a Type 1 action.
While this basically tells you what it does it is hardly useful when you also have:
Code:
Faithful Revival
Description:
In combat you will occasionally heal your team, including yourself. Only one type 1 action can be selected at a time
Now looking at both of these in my perk window or on my hotbar how do I tell which one is better for me to use? I have to either check a database site or check my research window as to what level which proc was research on and hope that it is safe to assume higher level means better.
It would be better, and a lot nicer to use, if it displayed like this instead:
Code:
Affiliated Renewal
Description:
In combat you will occasionally heal your team, including yourself for 201 - 406 points. This is a Type 1 action.
Code:
Faithful Revival
Description:
In combat you will occasionally heal your team, including yourself for 485 - 970 points. Only one type 1 action can be selected at a time
In which case it is easy to see which one is better and which one you should use.
(And a small side note, looking at this, why not fix the difference in how it's worded too? "This is a Type 1 action." and "Only one type 1 action can be selected at a time" It just looks weird  )
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 01:55:53
|
#3
|
|
-=Power Overwhelming=-
|
bump!
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 06:40:08
|
#5
|
|
Tank Extraordinaire
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaun
Big bump for this one.. lol 
|
omg, you agreed with ayria 
bump
__________________
Oltcit - 220/22/69 troxie enf -= Proud General of Deadly Whispers =- RK1
Roflcopterz - 220/17/60 troxie nubstick wielder
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 06:42:23
|
#6
|
|
:| <-srsface
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stick
omg, you agreed with ayria 
|
This is the way the world ends
(bump  )
__________________
bai2u!
-::l2pvp!1::-
Electronite: FFA also destroyed Clan hegemony when it comes to tower wars. Ironically the downfall was started by the most active pvpers. Another ironic thing is that the downfall happened due to pvm conflict. Silirrion: (We have pretty good anti-troll filters by now though) Means: Thong-wearing troxes will always be a part of this game and a point of AO pride. Keldros: Obviously reall trolls don't use conditioner Marlark: If this forum was Swedish in it's language .. id pawn you any day. 220 NT: tl7 is a joke most of the time. 90% of the people are double double dead. some are worth debuffing tho. Mastablasta: you guys are right and I'm wrong. Ebag: No. You alpha me'd due to the stat bug. More Ebag: I don't have any twinks currently, nor do I participate much in mass TL7 PvP (though I do go occasionally, usually just to watch). Questra: an MP in sneak eNSDed me and did about 20k damage in 10-12 seconds
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 07:05:33
|
#7
|
|
Siege "Starcraft" Tank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stick
omg, you agreed with ayria 
bump
|
I tried to explain this before.. I bump good ideas.. I debump bad ones.. but I don't prejudge a topic based on the poster.. I give every idea a fair chance..  Besides.. you didn't know Ayria and I were just having a little forum foreplay..? 
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 07:27:12
|
#8
|
|
One Who Has Ideas
|
Foreplay sounds fun...
But I think Proc Descriptions are more realistic 
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 07:42:03
|
#9
|
|
Doctor Professional
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiden
bump, I find myself on aodb constantly for this info. 
|
/supported
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stick
what? you mean there are not enough pvp-ers in this game to get the BS running? that's impossible. shocking. it cannot be. then how come every freakin balance/LE mish/VP idea is shot down by a pvp-er because he says the majority of the players are pvp?
you are probably mistaking. go do those numbers again.
|
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 08:10:08
|
#10
|
|
Tank Extraordinaire
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaun
you didn't know Ayria and I were just having a little forum foreplay..? 
|
could've fooled me  probably you were in a bad mood last week then
anyway, back on topic, how about a modification on the procs to the likes we have for SBs. i mean if you get a better proc in the same line, the old one is not available anymore.
__________________
Oltcit - 220/22/69 troxie enf -= Proud General of Deadly Whispers =- RK1
Roflcopterz - 220/17/60 troxie nubstick wielder
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 08:25:08
|
#11
|
|
One Who Has Ideas
|
That could work too, alleviate some of the clutter in the perk window too.
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 08:29:10
|
#12
|
|
Doctor Professional
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stick
could've fooled me  probably you were in a bad mood last week then
anyway, back on topic, how about a modification on the procs to the likes we have for SBs. i mean if you get a better proc in the same line, the old one is not available anymore.
|
No!
I switch between them depending on what I'm doing...
Example
- Righteous Smite
Type 2: TEAM - All Damage Types +95
- Ambient Purification
Type 2: TEAM - Heals 481 - 948
Both from same line and both type 2...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stick
what? you mean there are not enough pvp-ers in this game to get the BS running? that's impossible. shocking. it cannot be. then how come every freakin balance/LE mish/VP idea is shot down by a pvp-er because he says the majority of the players are pvp?
you are probably mistaking. go do those numbers again.
|
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 08:35:30
|
#13
|
|
One Who Has Ideas
|
I think he was meaning two of the same type. Heals, dmg, etc.
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 08:51:14
|
#14
|
|
Supa Leet
|
My god yes. Vague descriptions are bad when it comes to a nano or proc.
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 09:09:11
|
#15
|
|
Doctor Professional
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayria
I think he was meaning two of the same type. Heals, dmg, etc.
|
That would make sense, but at least for keepers no line have similar PROC type in same research line.
EDIT...
Quote:
|
i mean if you get a better proc in the same line, the old one is not available anymore.
|
If by "line" he means something like PROC school (heals/damage/reflects/evades) or whatever to call it, rather than research line then I can follow and support it... 
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stick
what? you mean there are not enough pvp-ers in this game to get the BS running? that's impossible. shocking. it cannot be. then how come every freakin balance/LE mish/VP idea is shot down by a pvp-er because he says the majority of the players are pvp?
you are probably mistaking. go do those numbers again.
|
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 09:46:40
|
#16
|
|
Tank Extraordinaire
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mekh
If by "line" he means something like PROC school (heals/damage/reflects/evades) or whatever to call it, rather than research line then I can follow and support it... 
|
same line means that if you run another one with a higher stacking order from the same nanoline it cancels the previous one.
so talking about nanolines and not research lines.
__________________
Oltcit - 220/22/69 troxie enf -= Proud General of Deadly Whispers =- RK1
Roflcopterz - 220/17/60 troxie nubstick wielder
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 10:31:43
|
#17
|
|
Doctor Professional
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stick
same line means that if you run another one with a higher stacking order from the same nanoline it cancels the previous one.
so talking about nanolines and not research lines.
|
kk... I agree then with your suggestion then 
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stick
what? you mean there are not enough pvp-ers in this game to get the BS running? that's impossible. shocking. it cannot be. then how come every freakin balance/LE mish/VP idea is shot down by a pvp-er because he says the majority of the players are pvp?
you are probably mistaking. go do those numbers again.
|
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 11:01:38
|
#18
|
|
By your powers combined..
|
bump, shouldn't have to rely on 3rd party sites to get to know what you are actually getting from a proc.
__________________
Transcendence
----
220 iii "Quilluck" iiiiii :: iii "Quillster" i 165
074 iii "Tradeursoul" i :: i "Fourthaid" ii 220
----
|
|
|
May 26th, 2008, 18:45:15
|
#19
|
|
-=Power Overwhelming=-
|
bump!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:26:15.
|