PvP range fix?

[Ilikedagunz2]

You can probly find both my threads on this if you look from a while back, always fun to see the "You lack skillz in leveling and didn't disable xp, you deserve to be ganked by 220's at 175. Forums are teh suck anyways Im going back to Spawn Camping now!" comments

I also would like to bump lower levels being able to attack anyone higher, would be easier to ding some pvp titles on my level 1 if I can gank some tl2-7

Gotta love those people :3

And by the way, I totally used your level 1's equipment for twinking my level 5 atrox. Didn't know your toon existed until about halfway through the twinking. I think it turned out rather well <33

So thanks for that, and the support ^^

[Ilikedagunz2]

bump

This forum requires that you wait 60 seconds between posts. Please try again in 17 seconds. lolwut

[Dopecat]

Bump.

[Ilikedagunz2]

Bump.

[Mazzarin]

I already wrote my opinion in this very similar thread: http://forums.anarchy-online.com/sho...d.php?t=566618

[Ilikedagunz2]

Indeed.

[Ilikedagunz2]

Bump ba dump bump.

[Thermonuked]

ok, seriously, the best way to balance pvp ranges, would be to have a 10% rule, ppl can only attack or be attacked by someone within 10% of their level, and that would be ascending, not descending so the lowest level a 220 could attack would be 200, the lowest a 200 could attack would be 182 (182+10%=200, not 200-10%=180) etc sure, it would make some of the current ranges interesting, but it should also stop the 150 fight, being joined by a 174 twink, being joined by a 219 and end up in everyone bringing their 220's to a tower fight they cant attack the towers at.

it'll mean more ppl making different ranges of twinks, chances are, more BS will run at different levels apart from 150-174 and 210-220, its good for everyone really

[Mazzarin]

No, that would suck, because my account is already full with twinks to cover all pvp level ranges. Besides, pvp level ranges are fine, except maybe the Shadow levels, since they should probably be counted as 5 normal levels.

[Ilikedagunz2]

No, that would suck, because my account is already full with twinks to cover all pvp level ranges. Besides, pvp level ranges are fine, except maybe the Shadow levels, since they should probably be counted as 5 normal levels.

And if you'll read the OP, you'll see that's exactly what I proposed, along with a TL check that would only affect tl5.

[Mazzarin]

And if you'll read the OP, you'll see that's exactly what I proposed, along with a TL check that would only affect tl5.

Aye, but I was refering to that 10% pvp range in the post above. Also, I don't think the TL check is necessary if you already count each SL at 5 normal levels.

[Ilikedagunz2]

Aye, but I was refering to that 10% pvp range in the post above. Also, I don't think the TL check is necessary if you already count each SL at 5 normal levels.

Yeah that 10% thing is madness.

And no, it isn't necessary, but it would be an easier fix than counting each shadowlevel as 5, because then you'd have to change at what range you can attack towers (ex: 220 would only be able to attack up to 280-something iirc).

[Mazzarin]

And no, it isn't necessary, but it would be an easier fix than counting each shadowlevel as 5, because then you'd have to change at what range you can attack towers (ex: 220 would only be able to attack up to 280-something iirc).

Nah, tower level ranges are calculated different already. Level 220s can attack QL300 towers, can't they? If you would calculate it with the current normal 20% range you'd have to be level 240 to attack QL300 towers

[Artyomis]

As i said before, simpliest solution to get rid of tl7 killing tl5 is to prevent 2 players from attacking each other if their titlelevel difference is higher than 1.

So tl7 can only attack tl6, tl6 can attack tl5/7, tl5 can attack tl4/6 and so on.
Absolutely nothing will change compared to current situation except tl7 vs tl5.

All other lower PvP ranges match my titlelevel lock idea, ie 159 will still be able to kill 126. 109 will still be able to kill 86. And so on.

[Mazzarin]

As i said before, simpliest solution to get rid of tl7 killing tl5 is to prevent 2 players from attacking each other if their titlelevel difference is higher than 1.

So tl7 can only attack tl6, tl6 can attack tl5/7, tl5 can attack tl4/6 and so on.
Absolutely nothing will change compared to current situation except tl7 vs tl5.

All other lower PvP ranges match my titlelevel lock idea, ie 159 will still be able to kill 126. 109 will still be able to kill 86. And so on.

I think such a TL lock is rather weird, since that would mean 204 can attack 162+, yet 205 only 190+. A gap of 28 levels..? :\ Besides, 205-220 would then all have the same pvp level range, so there would be no point in staying 205-219. If you count 1 Shadow level as 5 normal levels, then the Shadow level pvp ranges would look something like this:

Max	Min
200	159
201	163
202	167
203	171
204	175
205	179
206	183
207	187
208	191
209	195
210	199
211	201
212	201
213	202
214	203
215	204
216	205
217	205
218	206
219	207
220	208

[Ilikedagunz2]

Lol, "it would be weird." Weird is better than downright f*cked up.

Or it would look something like this. (third page)

[Ilikedagunz2]

Big bump. This sh*t is retarded.

[Gatester]

Bump, lemme make 201 twinks or I quit (well already taking a break but you get the point)

[Ilikedagunz2]

Bump ba dump.

[Ilikedagunz2]

Shoop da bump.