bump
This forum requires that you wait 60 seconds between posts. Please try again in 17 seconds. lolwut
I already wrote my opinion in this very similar thread: http://forums.anarchy-online.com/sho...d.php?t=566618
ok, seriously, the best way to balance pvp ranges, would be to have a 10% rule, ppl can only attack or be attacked by someone within 10% of their level, and that would be ascending, not descending so the lowest level a 220 could attack would be 200, the lowest a 200 could attack would be 182 (182+10%=200, not 200-10%=180) etc sure, it would make some of the current ranges interesting, but it should also stop the 150 fight, being joined by a 174 twink, being joined by a 219 and end up in everyone bringing their 220's to a tower fight they cant attack the towers at.
it'll mean more ppl making different ranges of twinks, chances are, more BS will run at different levels apart from 150-174 and 210-220, its good for everyone really
No, that would suck, because my account is already full with twinks to cover all pvp level ranges. Besides, pvp level ranges are fine, except maybe the Shadow levels, since they should probably be counted as 5 normal levels.
As i said before, simpliest solution to get rid of tl7 killing tl5 is to prevent 2 players from attacking each other if their titlelevel difference is higher than 1.
So tl7 can only attack tl6, tl6 can attack tl5/7, tl5 can attack tl4/6 and so on.
Absolutely nothing will change compared to current situation except tl7 vs tl5.
All other lower PvP ranges match my titlelevel lock idea, ie 159 will still be able to kill 126. 109 will still be able to kill 86. And so on.
G.F.B.D.
--------------------------------------------
Artyomis has played 800 days 0 hours 0 minutes 0 seconds
WTB subscription price lowered for eastern europe countries due to current USD/EUR-to-local-currency rates.
I think such a TL lock is rather weird, since that would mean 204 can attack 162+, yet 205 only 190+. A gap of 28 levels..? :\ Besides, 205-220 would then all have the same pvp level range, so there would be no point in staying 205-219. If you count 1 Shadow level as 5 normal levels, then the Shadow level pvp ranges would look something like this:
Code:Max Min 200 159 201 163 202 167 203 171 204 175 205 179 206 183 207 187 208 191 209 195 210 199 211 201 212 201 213 202 214 203 215 204 216 205 217 205 218 206 219 207 220 208
Lol, "it would be weird." Weird is better than downright f*cked up.
Or it would look something like this. (third page)
Big bump. This sh*t is retarded.