Fix Defeat RIghteousness

[navycut]

u want just the anti keeper nem nano gone ? or all ?

just removeing the anti keeper one and not the rest isn't fair.
Makeing it not hurt keepers much , would make it not work as intended

dont see how its broken thou, and yes i do have a keeper

Description:
Nano Crystal - This nano formula will remove active auras from a Keeper.

it says REMOVE not disable, so hows it broken ?


just get the skills req on keeper nanos made lower so u can rebuff

Are you mentally ill? Or just trolling?

I don't have a keeper and I see how retarded and lame this nano is.

[haavarst]

u want just the anti keeper nem nano gone ? or all ?

just removeing the anti keeper one and not the rest isn't fair.
Makeing it not hurt keepers much , would make it not work as intended

dont see how its broken thou, and yes i do have a keeper

Description:
Nano Crystal - This nano formula will remove active auras from a Keeper.

it says REMOVE not disable, so hows it broken ?


just get the skills req on keeper nanos made lower so u can rebuff

Says remove, but on live it removes the nano also, its not inn school with the base nano. But ofcourse lower reqs would have been awesome.

Click on these two links and then tell us what part of the nano DR should remove.

base

aura

If it was supposed to remove Imminence base nano it would look like it does on heal aura school

base

[Graftmage]

Says remove, but on live it removes the nano also, its not inn school with the base nano. But ofcourse lower reqs would have been awesome.

Click on these two links and then tell us what part of the nano DR should remove.

base

aura

If it was supposed to remove Imminence base nano it would look like it does on heal aura school

base

Auno.org only shows one nano school per line (but in reality it can be in six different nanolines). DR consists of two nanos, they cancel all aura bases and their effects. Look it up on aomainframe.

[haavarst]

Auno.org only shows one nano school per line (but in reality it can be in six different nanolines). DR consists of two nanos, they cancel all aura bases and their effects. Look it up on aomainframe.

that makes it so less retarded how?

[Graftmage]

It just proves that all of DR effects are intended.

[Wakizaka]

Active means it should be the active parts of the aura and not the base.

[Hacre]

It just proves that all of DR effects are intended.

Can you knock off the trolling. It should block the part that buffs the Keeper (after cancelling it) for the duration of the nano, not result in 5 minutes of rebuffing.

Besides if you can't land Blur followed by drains on a Keeper that is missing 210 aad, there's something wrong with you.

[Graftmage]

Besides if you can't land Blur followed by drains on a Keeper that is missing 210 aad, there's something wrong with you.

No, that means that there's something wrong with shades.

Can't kill it - annoy it.

[Hacre]

No, that means that there's something wrong with shades.

Neither point, mine or yours, justifies the effect Defeat Righteousness has.

[Mercs]

@$!@&$!€#@!*!!!!!!!!

[Dethrattle]

bump(from a shade!) for a fix for this. DR needs to overwrite the effect part of the auras, not the base.

[Mercs]

yea do we really have to wait til balancing patch to fix this f...ing thing???

shades purposely look for me just to cast this because they love to see me have to swap a bunch of **** and rebuff, then eventually leave battlestation, then I ussually get a tell from them laughing about how they forced me off battlestation. as if keeper isnt lacking enough pvp ability this is the freaking nail in the coffin. fix please...

[mharut]

bump - this is F*****g stupid. Absolutely makes me irate, almost worth logging onto another game just to avoid having this cast on my toon.

[Baja69]

B u m p

[NoGoal]

No need to bump this. If you have nothing to add I'll lock it.